020 3372 5125 Email us today
Enquire today
Parental Alienation
Parental Alienation

Parental Alienation

By Seema Kansal

Seema Kansal is a Barrister for RVS Solicitors, with extensive knowledge and experience in immigration and family law. Seema is highly educated, graduating from The University of York, Middle Temple and BPP Law School, she is also a member of the Family Law Bar Association. The bulk of her wide experience lies in family law cases, but she has also successfully led many immigration cases too. Absolutely relentless in her approach to each case, she is an extremely valuable asset to our team and our clients.

Parental Alienation is a real thing and is well recognised in the family courts as something that happens and is particularly harmful to the child. It skews the child’s ability to form any and all sorts of relationships and is not limited to the failed relationship with the other parent. It is emotionally harmful to the child. There may be lots of parents who are worried about this particularly in light of the COVID 19 pandemic where parents have used the pandemic to cease all contact notwithstanding the government advice that children should still be ferried between both houses for the purposes of contact. On this note, any real complaint can only be levied if the non- resident parent has unsupervised direct contact with the child prior to the lockdown.

From the cases that have been heard in the family courts on parental alienation there are some consistent factors which you will find when alienation maybe a real thing;

  • The child hasn’t seen their non-resident parent in a while
  • the attitude of the child to seeing the non-resident parent prior to no contact was positive and then abruptly changed.
  • the mother cannot provide an explanation for the change in the child’s attitude towards the non-resident parent.

What is essential in cases that are being run as parental alienation cases is that “findings” are secured as soon as possible against the resident parent. Findings are judgements made by the court after having heard and seen evidence in a trial. The sort of findings you would want seen made in order to secure a finding that it is more likely than not that there has been parental alienation is:

  • The child’s relationship has not been consistently promoted by the non-resident parent.
  • The resident parent was not in a position to promote the relationship between the child and the non-resident parent.
  • The resident parent had alienated the child against the non-resident parent.
  • The non-resident parent is better able to promote a relationship between the other parent and the child if the child were to live with him.
  • The child’s welfare is best met by a transfer in resident to the other parent.

There is little point in mounting a case of parental alienation if the client does not also seek a change in residence. They pretty much go hand in hand.

Evidential considerations when running a case of Parental Alienation.

You should look at the evidence that exists to show the change in the child’s attitude, abrupt change in a matter of time when there is no apparent intervening factor. You would look at emails/ what’s app/ snap chat messages to prove this. The resident parent should be asked in the trial to explain why they think there is a change in attitude. The Judge would then assess whether this is plausible.

You can instruct an expert in parental alienation which was done in a recent case of Re H (parental alienation); [2020] 1 FCR 17. If you are privately paying then this will cost money. But it is worth considering if there is some real evidence of it. In the case of Re H, the expert described a situation in which the mother’s opinions about the father had been transferred to the child gradually over time and were now complete. The expert opined that the most likely explanation for this was alienation. She described the mother’s views as entrenched and the prognosis for any shift was unpromising if the child remained with her mother.

Particular observations about the case of Re H

In the case of Re H the expert report as detailed above gave a clear opinion that the child had been alienated against the father. The NYAS case worker also prepared a report making only a passing reference to the expert report. She had spoken once to the mother and father and gave a clear and unequivocal recommendation in the NYAS report that the child should live with the mother and have no contact whatsoever with the father. The NYAS report considered only the negative issues about the father and set out the mother’s criticisms of him with no consideration at all of the adverse role of the mother in the child’s life; no consideration was given as to the extent to which the mother might have alienated the child against the father. The report accepted the child’s wishes and feelings at face value and gave no consideration to the expert’s report. The NYAS case worker was challenged in cross examination by the barrister and she could give no explanation for 1) the failure in her report to raise the issue of a lack of time to complete her enquiries or to write a report; or 2) for the change in the recommendation being made.

The social worker also prepared a s37 report making only a passing reference to the expert’s report., The s37 report was critical of the father but not the mother and had no regard to the expert’s opinion and conclusions.

The parents gave evidence and the mother was very critical of the father.

The judge formed a very positive view of the father. It was clear to the judge that the child had a very good relationship with his father prior to the breakdown in contact. The court could discern no reason for the complete breakdown and collapse of their relationship other than the malign influence of the mother. It was plain to the court that the mother saw no benefit to the child of the father having a relationship. The father had not been blameless and had at times acted inappropriately but he had expressed remorse for this and the court considered this to be genuine.

Some general observations by me

Whilst litigation can be difficult and expensive, running a case of parental alienation really needs the specialism of a solicitor and barrister. There are very important and skilled questions that need to be put to the other witnesses in cross examination and sadly when people run their cases as litigant’s in persons they fail to do this and get the point across. Interestingly, in the case of Re H the mother was a LIP and the father was represented. It also is really the only shot you get at running this case and if you lose then you are stuck with a child who is alienated against you and probably some undesirable findings.

Please do not hesitate to contact us for more details on your case and to put together a case plan. Call us on 020 3372 5125 or complete our online enquiry form to arrange a consultation.

Please call us on 020 3372 5125 or get an online consultation





    Contact our experts in Family department
    Parental Alienation
    Latest News
    Parental Alienation
    What Our Clients
    Say About Us
    Testimonials
    She is very professional while creating a friendly and comforting relationship with her clients
    I am very happy with the level and quality of service I got from Dr. Lusine Navasardyan. She is very professional while creating a friendly and comforting relationship with her clients. The service from Lusine was professional,efficient and well organised. Lusine worked extremely hard at resolving my all issues while getting the best result.
    What Our Clients
    Say About Us
    Testimonials
    Dealing with Rakhi was more like having In house counsel than hiring a law firm
    So Rakhi Singal of RVS has just handled my divorce, it was a very complex case and I came to Rakhi at the very last minute on a friend’s recommendation. My case was a mess and I stood to lose everything.

    Dealing with Rakhi was more like having In-House counsel than hiring a law firm, she does not approach her clients as a cash machine like many law firms do, she works with you to manage and minimise your costs and de-escalate conflict rather than throw wood on the fire.
    What Our Clients
    Say About Us
    Testimonials
    She has been very professional and a reliable person
    Dr. Lusine has been working on my case. She has been very professional and a reliable person. She was always attending to my queries and she has always been very friendly throughout my case.
    What Our Clients
    Say About Us
    Testimonials
    Rakhi’s passion for her profession supersedes the norm
    From the very outset of my situation, Rakhi identified the immediate difficulties I faced and offered me a sympathetic and rational approach to my situation, ensuring that she had a full understanding of my issues and concerns. Rakhi’s approach to my case was monumental and customary to my needs and that of my child, which was a fundamental point for me.
    What Our Clients
    Say About Us
    Testimonials
    Very detailed advice, friendly and approachable
    Excellent service for my wife's spousal visa from Lusine: very detailed advice, friendly and approachable. Also flexible in contact by email and provided an excellent cover letter.
    What Our Clients
    Say About Us
    Testimonials
    Really impressed with Rakhi’s dedication to our case
    Could not be more pleased with the results!

    Really impressed with Rakhi’s dedication to our case and her knowledge and experience on dealing with the case. She communicated with us throughout the process, providing me with regular updates. Thank you so much, I cannot vouch for her work enough and RAW Invites are happy for you to continue to act for all their matters in the future.
    What Our Clients
    Say About Us
    Testimonials
    She is professional, intelligent, hard worker and cheerful!
    I highly recommend Dr. Lusine Navasardyan, as she is professional, intelligent, hard worker and cheerful, she helped us from the beginning of our case until the very end, when she prepared a strong bundle with over 385 pages, which helped us get a successful victory in our Asylum case . I strongly recommend her as I really appreciate all the professional work that she has done . Many thanks to her.
    What Our Clients
    Say About Us
    Testimonials
    Professionalism, Quality, Responsiveness, Value
    Highly recommended. Lusine helped me out with my ILR 10-year continuous residency application. She explained everything to me, and patiently answered all my questions. She also put my mind at ease. They are very quick in replying to my emailed queries. I consulted two other solicitors before someone recommended RVS to me; the first one did not seem quite sure what to do, the second had exorbitant rates. RVS's fees are very reasonable given their professionalism.
    What Our Clients
    Say About Us
    Testimonials
    Professionalism, Quality, Responsiveness, Value
    I am so thankful that we found RVS Solicitors. I had an extremely complicated immigration case which has been successful. Lusine and Eylem was extremely patient and helpful during the entire process and went above and beyond to help me. Their knowledge on immigration law is second to none and they explore all possible options in order to help you. I will never be able to thank them enough for their advice, service and compassion.
    What Our Clients
    Say About Us
    Testimonials
    Professionalism
    The best lawyers . They work very professional they help you they always out there for you to help you out in your situation well done RVS Solicitors I will extremely recommend 👍and special thank to Eylem Kara 🙂
    Our Google Reviews
    Read our Google reviews
    Parental Alienation Parental Alienation Parental Alienation Parental Alienation Parental Alienation Parental Alienation